Moment of Clarity

Welcome to E Quint Consulting. If you’re new here, you may want to find out what E Quint does or subscribe to the RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

I think everyone has those moments when all of the little threads of information and experience come into alignment and you get a moment of clarity. It is a great feeling. It just happened to me coming out of the Enterprise 2.0 conference last week.

Overall the conference was great, if for nothing more than the people I met. But I digress…

Thursday night after I got home, I was washing dishes when it hit me, all the conversations, everything I had been reading for the last few years. Everything synthesized into a single compelling idea.

In today’s world the rate at which the volume of content is increasing, is outstripping the ability of organizations to develop systems to manage that information. The only solution that will allow effective access to this information is one that is simple, open and allows for emergence. There is no way to design and build a structured information system fast enough to keep up with the rate of change of content. This can only be done by a system to without predetermined structure and strict rules. Sound like a recipe for chaos? Exactly!

Now I am not advocating the elimination of all structured systems. All I am saying is that we need to augment our existing systems, processes and structures with a new framework of interconnectedness that facilitates the emergence of new ways of interacting and moving information.

Is this what “Enterprise 2.0” is all about. I am not sure. But I am sure that we are going in the right direction.

Content is not King

If you want to have some fun, in an echo chamber, geeky sort of way, tell Luis Suarez that email is critical and unavoidable. Be prepared for a wonderful rant. I tried this out yesterday upon arriving at the Enterprise 2.0 conference.

What we ended up talking about was the tired old model of email as huge content dumping ground. Of course this could lead to a long discussion about the evolution of email…but that is another topic. What interests me is the implied concept that content is no longer king, the network is.

More and more I see that people are going to their trusted network for information as opposed to straight search. You see it when some one posts a question on Twitter or LinkedIN. You see it when some one does do a traditional search only to find the person or people that are knowledgable on the topic and skip actuallly reading the content itself.

If we believe in this premise, that content is the only the crown prince and the network is what really matters, the way we define, design, and deploy processes and systems will fundamentally change from the way we have been working.

It’s about the People…

Vanderwal at Personal InfoCloud just posted Enterprise Social Tools: Components for Success. In a nutshell, he discusses the “four rings of enterprise social tools” and how they must work in conjunction in order to achieve success. His four rings are:

  • Tools
  • Interface & Ease of use
  • Sociality
  • Encouraging Use

He portrays the four rings as a Venn diagram, focusing on the intersecting sections of the four rings. Please read his original post, I am not going to repeat it here.

But I do want to point out that this is another example of someone who understands that Enterprise 2.0 and the connected enterprise is about much more than a mere set of tools and technology. It is about how people interact with each other and behave while they happen to be using the tools.

Maybe Hugh says it best:

Engagement & Productivity

Engagement is a tricky word. Often used and rarely agreed as to what it means. Funny how words can be that way. But if we have a conversation about its meaning, we can at usually come to a mutually agreed working definition.

One of the bits of wisdom I have picked up over the years is that the misunderstanding of words and intent is easily the leading contributor to wasted time and lack of productivity within the enterprise. It would not surprise me to find out that inside the typical organization more than half of the effort expended, is spent redoing previous work due to a misunderstanding.

This is not surprising if you look at how information flows within most organizations. In the traditionally structured industrial organization, it’s mostly top-down, with a little side-to-side across functions, and very little bottom-up ( mainly just for show) . So when the “word” gets passed down from the top, everyone translates the meaning for themselves and goes on their merry way. But guess what, almost everyone translated the “word” differently and is heading in different directions as hard as they can. The inevitable outcome is that in the end, the pieces don’t fit and it is crisis mode or back to the drawing board to start over.

So let’s bring engagement into the picture and see what happens. To be clear, I will define engagement as:

The behavioral norm of a connected enterprise, where there is a freedom, willingness and ability for any stakeholder to question, challenge or respond to any person at any level on any topic, and is expected to do so.

If your enterprise is connected, and all the stakeholders are engaged, it is reasonable and expected to receive pushback from the beginning, to have people check for clarity and meaning. When everyone is engaged, connected and paying attention from the start, problems are detected and dealt with early, reducing the the frequency of the “Ready, Fire, Aim” scenario. Crisis’s are averted, rework goes away, productivity goes up, bottom line improves. You gotta love that!

So stop standing around, get engaged!

oldie but goodie

I created this slide show last summer for internal use at GSK. I figured, just for fun, I would post it in SlideShare. Since then it has been viewed over 14,000 times, favorited by 120 SlideShare users and downloaded over 1600 times. Who knew…

Now if I can just figure out how to convert some of those people to clients. :-)

Copyright © 2007 E Quint Consulting. All rights reserved.