<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Behaviors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equintconsulting.com/enterprise-20-behaviors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equintconsulting.com/enterprise-20-behaviors/</link>
	<description>Developing the Connected Enterprise</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://equintconsulting.com/enterprise-20-behaviors/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equintconsulting.com/?p=34#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Good post Lee, thanks. It mirrors where my thoughts have been for some time. The technology is there (aside from Twitter issues recently!), in at least being able to provide a meaningful user experience. The problem, as you rightly point out, is adoption--getting users to adopt a technology. For example, most people don't see the point of Twitter (or other social network) until they begin to use it. So the non-users need to modify their mindset to a point where they will at least try the technology. "Don't knock 'til you've tried it," is a long worn adage, that fits most appropriately. The science of behavior modification is "captology." One of the leaders in this space is BJ Fogg at Stanford: http://www.bjfogg.com/ His site and linked sites are well worth a visit if you are interested in this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Lee, thanks. It mirrors where my thoughts have been for some time. The technology is there (aside from Twitter issues recently!), in at least being able to provide a meaningful user experience. The problem, as you rightly point out, is adoption&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;getting users to adopt a technology. For example, most people don&#8217;t see the point of Twitter (or other social network) until they begin to use it. So the non-users need to modify their mindset to a point where they will at least try the technology. &#8220;Don&#8217;t knock &#8216;til you&#8217;ve tried it,&#8221; is a long worn adage, that fits most appropriately. The science of behavior modification is &#8220;captology.&#8221; One of the leaders in this space is BJ Fogg at Stanford: <a href="http://www.bjfogg.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bjfogg.com/</a> His site and linked sites are well worth a visit if you are interested in this&nbsp;topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
