My 1st Webinar

This Thursday (Nov., 6) at 11:00 EST, I will be offering my first online “webinar”. I mentioned it in an earlier post. There have been some changes since I wrote that. Most notable is that I will be hosting this event on my own. Circumstances have prevented my planned co-host from being able to participate… So on with the show.

Here is the key bit of information, https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/999220840 the registration link.

The panel will be:

The topic of discussion will be about how social tools can be used within companies to improve organizational productivity.

I hope you will join, and if you know of anyone else that might find this valuable, please forward the registration link.

Exposing the Back Office with RSSBus

In several of my recent posts I have referenced Tim O’Reilly’s Web 2.0 Expo keynote, where I recall he talked about Enterprise 2.0 being about exposing the back office. I was curious to see if anyone else had picked up on that meme, and found little evidence of it, so I wondered if maybe I had misheard what he said. I went back and found the speech and picked up the exact quote:

Enterprise 2.0 means letting users into your back office,


Listen from 5:30 to 8:20 to hear his entire argument.

Sounds cool, so how does one actually go about doing this? I wondered the same thing. This is where serendipity and social networks come into play. About the same time I went to Web2Expo, I was catching up with a former colleague from GSK, Ralph James. It just so happens that Ralph currently works with a company that does exactly what O’Reilly was talking about, creating a simple access mechanism for back office data. That company is RSSBus.

From the RSSBus whitepaper Flattening the Information Landscape:

In his iconic book, “The World Is Flat”, Thomas Friedman lists the World Wide Web as one of the ten key world flatteners making a wealth of information available to anyone and everyone no matter where they live.  He compares HTTP to the railroad track and HTML to the boxcar that carries information from everywhere to anywhere.

However, while HTML does a good job of presenting formatted pages of information to browsers, professional information providers know how difficult it is to extract the raw data from HTML for follow-up processing like filtering or merging - and this is only one of the limitations of today’s web:  there are countless databases, news groups, personal mail files, text documents, and spreadsheets lurking throughout the network that are not served via HTTP.  While most of these repositories can be accessed directly via SQL, Internet protocols or custom API’s, the inconsistency of access protocols and formats create a barrier to quick and seamless data access.

RSSBus is a suite of information access products that provide ready-to-use connectors to several dozen Internet and Enterprise information sources while hiding differences of data organization and access protocols. The RSSBus developer learns only one call mechanism, using it to access SQL databases, office documents, network protocols, message queues, email systems, news groups, blogs, financial services, web services like the ones from Amazon, Google, Yahoo, and FedEx, and dozens of other resources.

Check out their site for a more detailed description of their product and service. I, for one, think there is huge potential here for developing the next generation applications for creating customer value, the real objective of any enterprise.

Is “Social Media” Really Social?

These days when it seems that everyone is extolling the virtues of social collaboration, it may seem odd to ask if social media is social. My point here is not to question the value of social collaboration, but to take a deeper look at the underlying characteristics of the tool-set we refer to as “social media”.

When blogs first came on the scene, I don’t think anyone was able to foresee the resulting “conversation” we all now take for granted. What the first bloggers saw was, an easy way to publish, the overcoming of previously high technical barriers. The resulting conversation was emergent, not intended. If you really look at it, I think you will find that the same is true for most of the social media formats, each was initially conceived as technical solution to a previously difficult problem.

OK … so what?

If we think of the “social tool-set” in strictly social terms, we can become blinded to the value these tools can bring to other areas of information management. I refer back again to what Tim O’Reily said at Web 2.0 Expo in NYC last September, “Enterprise 2.0 is about exposing the back office.” When you think about the implication of what he was saying, there is a lot there that has nothing to do with social behavior, per se. Exposing the back office means,

  • having direct access to your account information with your cell carrier;
  • being able to directly schedule your own appointments to get your car serviced;
  • not having to wait 30 minutes on hold to get tech support.

These are all examples of what will be the next generation enterprise applications, built on a set of tools that are inherently simple, scalable and flexible. These applications will look a lot like blogs, wikis, RSS readers, etc, but they will not necessarily be social.

The point being, that social media came into being because for the first time a set of tools existed that was able to be easily used by a broad number of people and was able to adapt fast enough to mirror real social interaction, not because the tools were inherently social.

So let’s take off the social blinders and look at the these tools as a new and better way to move information simply and easily from where it is, to where it needs to be, regardless of whether that information is social or not.

Relationship Aggregation

I am coming to the realization that one of the problems with social networks (the online kind that is) is that the focus seems to be in the individual instead of the relationship.

Look at any of the SNs out there today, there is a huge amount of effort spent on the development of your profile: creating it, protecting it, generating new content to make it fatter, etc. While there is very little attention paid to the development of relationships. Oh yeah…there are lots of tools for creating new connections, but once connected, there is little ability to create a rich relationship.

I am wondering if a better model might be to center the network around the relationship instead of the individual. Think of it this way, between any two entities, there is, in reality, a large amount of shared content in many formats: email, IM, tweets, phone calls, collaborative documents. Imagine if that content was aggregated in such a way that it was equally owned and shared by both ends of the relationship. Now that would be valuable.

I can see where each entity of the relationship could manage their own use of the relationship aggregate through filters and feeds, but they would still retain equal ownership of the shared content.

This approach would have great applicability for personal/individual relationships, but the real value comes into play with B2B and B2C relationships. Imagine, for example, if you and your mobile carrier shared all of the content about the relationship, in a common accessible location…billing records, support records, email transactions, support chats, etc.

Yes, I realize there MAY be some SLIGHT ownership and control issues from the perspective of those that currently “own” the data, but I think that in time, as the inherent value in this approach comes to be appreciated, that will change.

These are just some initial thoughts. If you think there is something to this, please jump in and join the conversation. I would especially be interested in hearing what Doc Searles and the VRM gang think.

The Connected Enterprise: The Webinar

E Quint Consulting is working with Near-Time to deliver a webinar series. The first one, scheduled for November 6 at 11:00a.m EST, is titled The Connected Enterprise: Using Social Connectivity to Drive Productivity. The webinar will consist of a panel discussion between some of the best practitioners in the field of Enterprise 2.0. Scheduled to participate are:

The webinar will be co-hosted by:

  • Lee Buck, Co-Founder & CTO, Near-Time
  • Lee White, Founder, E Quint Consulting

The focus of the conversation will be around the factors that contribute to a successful Enterprise 2.0 implementation, and practical advice for carrying out such a project. Some of the questions the panel will address include:

  • How important are the social and behavioral aspect of creating a successful “connected enterprise” initiative, as opposed to the strictly technical aspects?
  • How does use of social tools in the enterprise lead to improvements in employee engagement and employee retention?
  • How does opening up information access reduce organizational risk?

Logistics for this webinar are underway and I will be posting them here shortly. So spread the word and tell people you know, that are looking for real, pragmatic information on improving organizational productivity, about this event.

See you there.

Copyright © 2007 E Quint Consulting. All rights reserved.